Senate conflict over Violence Against Women Act
Hasty Senate decisions bypass fiscal responsibility
It is disappointing that the Senate rejected Sen. Chuck Grassley's, R-Iowa, proposed amendments to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which included some very modest financial accountability provisions for VAWA recipients ["Senate poised to renew Violence Against Women Act," seattletimes.com, Feb. 7]. In its haste to pander to the women's vote, the Senate approved continued handouts of millions of taxpayer dollars without any strings attached.
Grassley's proposal recognized that a Justice Department audit of VAWA grantees found a high rate of irregularities in fund expenditures or record-keeping. It also provided for more protections against alleged victims using fraud and false allegations of abuse to take advantage of VAWA's "get a free green card" program.
Apparently, fiscal responsibility with taxpayer subsidies goes out the window when the money is earmarked for women/victims. Aside from the blatant gender bias inherent in the act, the least we should get is some financial accountability.
--Lisa Scott, Bellevue
Jodi Rave Spotted Bear
(Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation)Founder & Editor in Chief
Spoken Languages: English
Topic Expertise: Federal trust relationship with American Indians; Indigenous issues ranging from spirituality and environment to education and land rights
Sharing Is Caring
This article is not included in our Story Share & Care selection.
The content may only be reproduced with permission from the Indigenous Media Freedom Alliance. Please see our content sharing guidelines.
© Buffalo's Fire. All rights reserved.
Respect The Fire
At Buffalo's Fire, we value constructive dialogue that builds an informed Indian Country. To keep this space healthy, moderators will remove:
- Personal attacks, harassment, or hate speech
- Spam, misinformation, or unsolicited promotion
- Off-topic rants and excessive shouting (All Caps)
Let’s keep the fire burning with respect.